Kodaly's teaching method increasing preschool children's solfege singing skills (IR)

Luen Loy Chee, Ayob Aminah, Wong Colleen, Augustine Christine,

QR Code Link :
Type :	article
Subject :	LB Theory and practice of education
ISSN :	-
Main Author :	Luen Loy Chee, Ayob Aminah, Wong Colleen, Augustine Christine,
Title :	Kodaly's teaching method increasing preschool children's solfege singing skills (IR)

Year of Publication :	2017
PDF Full Text :	The author has requested the full text of this item to be restricted.

Full Text :

The purpose of this study is to identify the difference between the children’s solfege singing skills in terms of the diction, pitch accuracy and rhythm between the treatment group and the control group. The solfege notation selected and evaluated in this study encompasses (i) so mi and (ii) so mi la. The duration of this study is two weeks. Fifty children from two preschools were selected as the respondents in this study. This study adopts the quasi-experimental design with one treatment group and one control group of twenty five children, respectively. The treatment group sang using hand signals, while the control group sang without the hand signals. The study finding shows that the Kodaly teaching method using hand signals is more effective to increase the skills in diction, pitch accuracy and rhythm if compared to the teaching method without the hand signals. Kodaly teaching method has given a positive impact based on the fact that the solfege notation needs to be used to improve children’s musical skills.

References

1. Autio, J. (2013). Kodaly: The next generation-reflection of a pre-service music educator. Canadian Music Education, 55.2, Winter: 24-28. 2. Bennett, P. D. (2005). So, why sol-mi? American music education can benefit from a reexamination of the practice of centering music education programs for young children around the sol-mi interval. Music Educators Journal, Jan 2005: 43. 3. Bowyer, J. (2015). More than solfege and hand signs: Philosophy, tools and lesson planning in the authentic Kodaly classroom. Music Educators Journal, 102.2: 69. 4. Devries, P. (2001). Reevaluating common Kodaly practices. Music Educators Journal, Nov. 2001:24. 5. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2016). Kurikulum Standard Prasekolah Kebangsaan. Putrajaya: Ministry of Education Malaysia. 6. Kodaly, Z. (1965). Let us sing correctly. London: Boosey & Hawkes. 7. Kodaly, Z. (1974). The selected writings of Zoltan Kodaly. London: Boosey & Hawkes. 8. Ng, Y. W. (2011). Menambahkan kemahiran menyanyi pic so dan mi yang tepat dalam kelas Tahun 3 melalui pendekatan Kodaly. Kajian Tindakan. Raja Melewar Teaching Institute, Negeri Sembilan, Malaysia. 9. Rainbow, B. (1980). John Curwen: A short critical biography. Sevenoaks: Novello. 10. Simon, H. (1973). Song and words: A history of the Curwen Press. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd.

This material may be protected under Copyright Act which governs the making of photocopies or reproductions of copyrighted materials.
You may use the digitized material for private study, scholarship, or research.

Back to previous page